2002 Mitsubishi Space Star — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 2,102 MOT tests analysed for the 2002 Mitsubishi Space Star, the most common recorded failure areas were suspension, lighting & signalling and brakes. Its pass rate of 65.3% was below the average for cars of a similar age (74.4%). Higher-mileage examples failed more often — 38.0% in the 150k+ group versus 29.7% in the 0-30k group.

65%
Pass rate
2,102
MOT tests analysed
34.7%
Fail rate
worse than
vs cars of similar age
20.4
Avg age at test (yrs)

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2002 Space Star 34.7% cars avg 25.6% National avg 27.5%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2002 Mitsubishi Space Star
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Suspension 19.8% 416
2 Lighting & signalling 19.2% 403
3 Brakes 13.3% 280
4 Body, structure & corrosion 12.9% 272
5 Tyres 7.2% 151
6 Visibility 5.5% 115
Share of tests failing on each category Suspension 19.8% Lighting & signalling 19.2% Brakes 13.3% Body, structure & corrosion 12.9% Tyres 7.2% Visibility 5.5%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2002 Mitsubishi Space Star
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Component mounting prescribed areas306
2Headlamp aim208
3Headlamp190
4Joints163
5Rigid brake pipes128
6Wipers116

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2002 Mitsubishi Space Star
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 42.9% 901
2 Suspension 42.1% 884
3 Tyres 30.2% 634
4 Lighting & signalling 21.6% 455
5 Body, structure & corrosion 20.8% 438
6 Other defects 14.9% 314

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 29.7% 30-60k 28.6% 60-90k 34.0% 90-120k 38.3% 120-150k 39.8% 150k+ 38.0%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2002 Space Star
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 37 29.7%
30-60k 479 28.6%
60-90k 683 34.0%
90-120k 566 38.3%
120-150k 226 39.8%
150k+ 108 38.0%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 19 yrs 35.4% 20 yrs 35.1% 21 yrs 32.9% 22 yrs 34.2% 23 yrs 35.4%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

By fuel type

Fail rate by fuel type — 2002 Space Star
Fuel Tests Fail rate
Petrol 1,854 34.3%
Diesel 248 37.5%

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2002 Space Star
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 676 35.4%
2022 527 35.1%
2023 392 32.9%
2024 301 34.2%
2025 206 35.4%

What to check before buying a 2002 Space Star

Before buying a 2002 Mitsubishi Space Star, focus on the areas it most often fails on. Suspension accounted for 19.8% of tests for this year.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2002 Mitsubishi Space Stars pass their MOT?

65.3% of the 2,102 2002 Mitsubishi Space Star MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 34.7% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2002 Mitsubishi Space Star?

Suspension, recorded in 19.8% of tests, followed by lighting & signalling (19.2%).

Does the 2002 Space Star get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 29.7% in the 0-30k band to 38.0% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 2,102 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-01. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data