2003 Rover 25 — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 5,777 MOT tests analysed for the 2003 Rover 25, the most common recorded failure areas were lighting & signalling, body, structure & corrosion and brakes. Its pass rate of 75.5% was above the average for cars of a similar age (74.3%). Higher-mileage examples failed more often — 29.5% in the 150k+ group versus 17.1% in the 0-30k group.

75%
Pass rate
5,777
MOT tests analysed
24.5%
Fail rate
better than
vs cars of similar age
19.5
Avg age at test (yrs)

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2003 25 24.5% cars avg 25.7% National avg 27.7%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2003 Rover 25
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 13.5% 779
2 Body, structure & corrosion 12.0% 695
3 Brakes 7.2% 419
4 Visibility 5.6% 321
5 Suspension 5.4% 314
6 Tyres 4.4% 254
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 13.5% Body, structure & corrosion 12.0% Brakes 7.2% Visibility 5.6% Suspension 5.4% Tyres 4.4%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2003 Rover 25
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Joints525
2Wipers305
3Component mounting prescribed areas301
4Stop lamp239
5Position lamp222
6Service brake performance219

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2003 Rover 25
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Tyres 26.6% 1,534
2 Brakes 23.5% 1,356
3 Body, structure & corrosion 20.5% 1,185
4 Suspension 19.8% 1,144
5 Lighting & signalling 12.0% 692
6 Emissions & environmental 11.9% 687

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 17.1% 30-60k 22.5% 60-90k 26.0% 90-120k 26.7% 120-150k 32.8% 150k+ 29.5%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2003 25
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 427 17.1%
30-60k 2,240 22.5%
60-90k 1,753 26.0%
90-120k 934 26.7%
120-150k 293 32.8%
150k+ 129 29.5%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 18 yrs 25.5% 19 yrs 23.7% 20 yrs 25.2% 21 yrs 24.2% 22 yrs 22.8%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

By fuel type

Fail rate by fuel type — 2003 25
Fuel Tests Fail rate
Petrol 5,282 24.6%
Diesel 495 23.8%

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2003 25
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 1,861 25.5%
2022 1,428 23.7%
2023 1,097 25.2%
2024 798 24.2%
2025 593 22.8%

What to check before buying a 2003 25

Before buying a 2003 Rover 25, focus on the areas it most often fails on. Lighting & signalling accounted for 13.5% of tests for this year.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2003 Rover 25s pass their MOT?

75.5% of the 5,777 2003 Rover 25 MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 24.5% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2003 Rover 25?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 13.5% of tests, followed by body, structure & corrosion (12.0%).

Does the 2003 25 get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 17.1% in the 0-30k band to 29.5% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 5,777 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-01. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data