2002 Rover 75 — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 10,893 MOT tests analysed for the 2002 Rover 75, the most common recorded failure areas were suspension, lighting & signalling and brakes. Its pass rate of 70.3% was below the average for cars of a similar age (74.5%). Higher-mileage examples failed more often — 34.2% in the 150k+ group versus 13.8% in the 0-30k group.

70%
Pass rate
10,893
MOT tests analysed
29.7%
Fail rate
worse than
vs cars of similar age
20.5
Avg age at test (yrs)

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2002 75 29.7% cars avg 25.5% National avg 27.5%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2002 Rover 75
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Suspension 19.4% 2,117
2 Lighting & signalling 13.5% 1,466
3 Brakes 10.6% 1,158
4 Body, structure & corrosion 6.2% 672
5 Visibility 4.8% 518
6 Seat belts & restraints 4.5% 493
Share of tests failing on each category Suspension 19.4% Lighting & signalling 13.5% Brakes 10.6% Body, structure & corrosion 6.2% Visibility 4.8% Seat belts & restraints 4.5%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2002 Rover 75
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Component mounting prescribed areas1,217
2Headlamp aim997
3Pins and bushes581
4Rigid brake pipes569
5Headlamp487
6Rbt (sp)418

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2002 Rover 75
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 37.9% 4,129
2 Brakes 36.6% 3,983
3 Tyres 24.7% 2,690
4 Lighting & signalling 18.4% 2,008
5 Other defects 11.4% 1,237
6 Body, structure & corrosion 10.6% 1,157

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 13.8% 30-60k 21.2% 60-90k 27.4% 90-120k 30.9% 120-150k 32.7% 150k+ 34.2%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2002 75
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 225 13.8%
30-60k 1,168 21.2%
60-90k 2,490 27.4%
90-120k 2,763 30.9%
120-150k 2,007 32.7%
150k+ 2,214 34.2%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 19 yrs 31.4% 20 yrs 29.9% 21 yrs 28.8% 22 yrs 28.4% 23 yrs 28.2%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

By fuel type

Fail rate by fuel type — 2002 75
Fuel Tests Fail rate
Diesel 6,780 31.4%
Petrol 4,108 26.9%

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2002 75
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 3,353 31.4%
2022 2,572 29.9%
2023 2,054 28.8%
2024 1,622 28.4%
2025 1,292 28.2%

What to check before buying a 2002 75

Before buying a 2002 Rover 75, focus on the areas it most often fails on. Suspension accounted for 19.4% of tests for this year.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2002 Rover 75s pass their MOT?

70.3% of the 10,893 2002 Rover 75 MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 29.7% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2002 Rover 75?

Suspension, recorded in 19.4% of tests, followed by lighting & signalling (13.5%).

Does the 2002 75 get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 13.8% in the 0-30k band to 34.2% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 10,893 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-01. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data